[PATCH 00/14] tdb: Update pytdb API to match what is provided by libtdb

Jelmer Vernooij jelmer at samba.org
Sun Sep 19 11:16:18 MDT 2010


Hi Kirill,

On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 13:53 +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote: 
> Rusty, Jelmer,
> 
> The subject says it all. Not 100% complete, but near.
Thanks for the patches. I've applied most of the Python ones. I'm not at
all convinced we should match the C API in the Python API though, I
rather think we should let the needs of our Python users drive what we
expose. Some of the worst Python bindings I've seen were created by
simply mapping every C function one on one to Python.

Is there any particular reason why some of these functions should be
exposed? Why do you need low-level locking?

Cheers,

Jelmer 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20100919/143e1f0c/attachment.pgp>


More information about the samba-technical mailing list