[PATCH] s4-drs: A quick fix for DRSUAPI_EXOP_FSMO_RID_ALLOC extended_op handling
abartlet at samba.org
Fri Sep 3 03:50:26 MDT 2010
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 12:02 +0300, Kamen Mazdrashki wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 07:16, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org>
> Sure, but why not just wrap it in a transaction?
> Ah, context shown is too small.
> It is in transaction already - transaction is started just above.
> I wanted to push this quick fix first so I can continue my work on
> synchronous implementation - without this, I get IRPC call timeout as
> it is taking
> too long for the vampired DC to merge data received from DC1 in test
OK, that seems quite reasonable. But if it's in a transaction, how do
we get the 'extra' responses you are worried about?
Anyway, let's get this in - we can fix it up to follow the doc more
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the samba-technical