8 fully ok build server for samba_4_0_next
Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer
mdw at samba.org
Wed Oct 27 14:17:03 MDT 2010
Yeah, ekacnet, that what you say is really true. I've fixed quite some
bugs regarding non fully standard-compliant C code (I mean C code with
GCC enhancements). Please keep up this important work!
Matthieu Patou wrote:
> As some might have noticed I decided to reduce the number of broken
> build on the build farm.
> We have now 8 servers ok, among them sles8 is a bit flacky on the
> samba4.rpc.samr.large.dc.two test, but I hope to fix it soon.
> Among the broken we have different state with the slightly broken like
> solaris8/gcc and solaris10/gcc and the other. I would classify the
> first one like quite ok (because getting everything ok is sometime
> very complicated).
> If everybody could take care of the currently ok and currently quite
> ok it would be good, as for instance freebsd build server moved from
> the quite ok to quite broken and it's not so fun to play whack a mole
> with every build server (that is to say while I'm fixing one, another
> is failing).
> Thank you.
More information about the samba-technical