8 fully ok build server for samba_4_0_next

[Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer]

Yeah, ekacnet, that what you say is really true. I've fixed quite some 
bugs regarding non fully standard-compliant C code (I mean C code with 
GCC enhancements). Please keep up this important work!

Greets,
Matthias

Matthieu Patou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As some might have noticed I decided to reduce the number of broken 
> build on the build farm.
>
> We have now 8 servers ok, among them sles8 is a bit flacky on the 
> samba4.rpc.samr.large.dc.two test, but I hope to fix it soon.
>
> Among the broken we have different state with the slightly broken like 
> solaris8/gcc and solaris10/gcc and the other. I would classify the 
> first one like quite ok (because getting everything ok is sometime 
> very complicated).
>
> If everybody could take care of the currently ok and currently quite 
> ok it would be good, as for instance freebsd build server moved from 
> the quite ok to quite broken and it's not so fun to play whack a mole 
> with every build server (that is to say while I'm fixing one, another 
> is failing).
>
> Thank you.
>
> Matthieu
>