Need a good way to deal with 'relax' security

Sat Oct 23 11:16:16 MDT 2010

On 18/10/2010 14:26, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 11:53 +0200, Matthias Dieter WallnÃ¶fer wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> no problem for me - I've reopened the bug report. Regarding different
>> controls: I wonder if this won't make everything too complex to achieve.
>> If we would like to achieve this then we should use RELAX for OpenLDAP
>> and some other RELAX for our actual uses in the dsdb code.
> Yes, that's the approach I would like to take.  I would start by
> defining a 'provision' control, which is for things that provision
> needs.
>
I already started the definition of this control.

Matthieu.

-- 
Matthieu Patou
Samba Team        http://samba.org