Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer
mdw at samba.org
Tue Oct 12 00:37:15 MDT 2010
I've written to MS and CCed you.
Hope you are comfortable with it. Regarding the "samldb2" patches? Are
you fine if I merge them?
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 17:13 +0300, Kamen Mazdrashki wrote:
>> Sorry for asking but, as long as I read the code,
>> you are replacing a code that returns some string, with code
>> that returns empty string (but now with a FIXME comment).
>> Both implementation are incorrect as long as I understood.
>> So my question is -> what is the benefit from this change?
>> An if my understanding is correct, then I should suggest you
>> to implement a test that reveals what the real behavior should be.
>> This test will fail and thus remind us we have something to do.
>> What I see now is masking the problem with another problem
>> with a FIXME comment :)
> I agree.
>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 16:06, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer
>> <mdw at samba.org>wrote:
>>> and is MS-SAMR 18.104.22.168 to vague for you?
>>>> ReplicaSourceNodeName: A counted Unicode string of type
>>>> represents a replication partner.
> Yes, I think this is vauge. Which replication partner does it
> represent? How is it selected?
> I think we should have more information and proof before changing
> working code into a TODO.
> Andrew Bartlett
More information about the samba-technical