Fixing "-k" in S4 smbtorture.

Matthieu Patou mat at
Thu May 20 13:08:53 MDT 2010

On 20/05/2010 22:30, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:24:34PM +0400, Matthieu Patou wrote:
>> Hi jeremy, it's a good idea but this command line parsing is also used in a lot of s4 utilities and if i read the patch well it will break scripts that use -k yes or -k 1 not 100 pleasant for admin among them me :-)
> That's why I was asking :-). Are there any cases where anyone
> used "-k no" ? I don't see the point of that option :-).
> No arguing that people might have done it, but if they
> did then I'll just fix the "usage" argument to save people
> lots of time if they're wondering why "-k foo" doesn't work
> when "foo" is part of another option.
So as far as I am concerned I didn't use it (just -k 1 when it's 
needed), if you keep the option -k 1|yes and also -k .

Matthieu Patou
Samba Team

More information about the samba-technical mailing list