[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated
Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer
mdw at samba.org
Sun May 16 11:03:29 MDT 2010
Jelmer,
this is needed since we don't have implemented the functional level
change trigger yet (which would also adjust the second value after the
first change).
The tool should support both the actual unchecked s4 behaviour and the
Windows one - therefore this strange-looking exception handling.
Greets,
Matthias
Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> hOn Fri, 2010-05-14 at 12:12 -0500, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote:
>
>> The branch, master has been updated
>> via d712356... s4:repl_meta_data LDB module - fix counter types
>> via 8608eae... s4:net domainlevel tool - fix up the error handling as Jelmer suggested
>> via 6d95a20... s4:dsdb_cache LDB module - fix a typo
>> via da5cd4b... s4:samldb LDB module - remove unused variables
>> from b5dc394... s4:gensec expose gensec_set_target_principal for use outside GENSEC
>>
>> http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
>>
>>
>> - Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
>> commit d7123565698fefd16e7696c0e4bb4ec98f6f62ac
>> Author: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer<mdw at samba.org>
>> Date: Fri May 14 18:56:51 2010 +0200
>>
>> s4:repl_meta_data LDB module - fix counter types
>>
>> commit 8608eaef76631666a41109317d2a9b20979c5025
>> Author: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer<mdw at samba.org>
>> Date: Fri May 14 18:59:36 2010 +0200
>>
>> s4:net domainlevel tool - fix up the error handling as Jelmer suggested
>>
>> Sorry, I've copied this from the "ldap.py" test and thought it would work.
>>
> Thanks for fixing that.
>
> Have you verified that we actually need that code? is there a particular
> reason why those modifies would fail and if they do should we really
> ignore that silently?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jelmer
>
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list