Patches for DFS implementation

Sassy Natan sassyn at
Thu May 13 14:00:27 MDT 2010

Same goes here ! - "Failed to find our own NTDS Settings objectGUID in the ldb"


On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
<metze at> wrote:
> Matthieu Patou schrieb:
>> Hello this is a serie of 6 patches made for implementing Domain referral
>> in samba4.
>> Those patches are made to allow s4 to respond to domain DFS referral
>> requests.
>> This is highly desirable when you have more than 1 DC.
>> Please note that it's not the server side implementation of the DFS
>> replication protocol.
>> Here is the detail of the patches:
>> 0001-pidl-fix-errors-and-improve-idl-in-dfsblobs.patch, This is a few
>> fixes for idl that I made in december that were found during the
>> developpement of the patches.
>> 0002-s4-fix-trailling-whitespace-in-trans2.c.patch, This is a formatting
>> patch for trans2.c
>> 0003-s4-Implement-GET_DFS_REFERRAL-for-domain-referral-re.patch, This is
>> the implementation of trans2/getreferrals requests for domain referrals
>> requests.
>> 0004-s4-torture-test-Adapt-ndr-dfsblobs-torture-test-to-n.patch, This
>> patch is to adapt the torture test to the renaming of functions in
>> dfsblobs.idl
>> 0005-s4-torture-Add-tests-for-dfs-referrals-handling-in-S.patch, This
>> patch is to add unittest for smb/trans2 requests. It has also been
>> tested with success against w2k8r2 server.
>> 0006-s4-add-dfs-smbtorture-to-selftests.patch, This patch is to add the
>> smbtorture tests to make tests.
>> After I'm willing to change provision so that DC have the host msdfs =
>> yes parameter, andrew what's your point of view ?
>> Jeremy, the torture tests will be a good start for us to tests the
>> capacity of s3 to handle get dfs referral requests when "plugged" into s4.
>> Ps: this patches pass make test
> For me it crashes in samba4.dfs.domain
> metze

More information about the samba-technical mailing list