Upgrade provision error again

[Matthieu Patou]

First,
You can't remove it from the reference provision as this provision is recreated at every start of upgradeprovision.

My guess is that there is already one user in your Sam with 1101 as rid. For some good reason upgradeprovision keep the sid of the reference object which is not good here obviously.

I'll send you a patch soon.

"Rohit Rajan" <rohit.rajan at catalyst-us.com> wrote:

>I have checked and found that the "objectSid: 
>S-1-5-21-2760325229-3840432484-2066034265-1101"  of DnsAdmins in 
>"/usr/local/samba/private/referenceprovision-toinF/private/sam.ldb" 
>clashing with the computer record in "/usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb"
>
>should i remove the DnsAdmins record from the referenceprovision sam.ldb??
>
>Thanks
>Rohit
>
>
>On 6/29/2010 10:10 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 08:52 +0530, Rohit Rajan wrote:
>>    
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> I have received the following error while upgrading from Version
>>> 4.0.0alpha12-GIT-5c98ccd to Git Pull "1e8876a  master     ->  origin/master"
>>>      
>>    
>>> _ldb.LdbError: (68, '../lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c:1175: Failed to
>>> re-index objectSid in CN=DnsAdmins,CN=Users,DC=XXXX,DC=com -
>>> ../lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c:1107: unique index violation on objectSid
>>> in CN=DnsAdmins,CN=Users,DC=XXXX,DC=com')
>>>      
>> So, as it says:  Somehow in either the old or new provision (I'm not
>> 100% sure), a duplicate SID has been added, but was not previously
>> detected.
>>
>> Can you see if you can find the DnsAdmins record in the old DB and see
>> if that might be the problem?
>>
>> Perhaps it's the recent DNS-related provision change causing problems?
>>
>> Andrew Bartlett
>>
>>    
>
>This message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. In case you are not the original intended recipient of the message, you must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message and you are requested to delete it and inform the sender. 
>
>Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender unless otherwise stated. Nothing contained in this message shall be construed as an offer or acceptance of any offer by "Catalyst Business Partners" or any of its subsidiaries unless sent with that express intent and with due authority of Catalyst Business Partners. 
>
>Catalyst Business Partners has taken sufficient measures and precautions to prevent the spread of viruses. However the company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
>

Matthieu Patou
Samba team