Upgrade provision error again

Rohit Rajan rohit.rajan at catalyst-us.com
Wed Jun 30 21:40:33 MDT 2010

I have checked and found that the "objectSid: 
S-1-5-21-2760325229-3840432484-2066034265-1101"  of DnsAdmins in 
clashing with the computer record in "/usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb"

should i remove the DnsAdmins record from the referenceprovision sam.ldb??


On 6/29/2010 10:10 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 08:52 +0530, Rohit Rajan wrote:
>> Dear All,
>> I have received the following error while upgrading from Version
>> 4.0.0alpha12-GIT-5c98ccd to Git Pull "1e8876a  master     ->  origin/master"
>> _ldb.LdbError: (68, '../lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c:1175: Failed to
>> re-index objectSid in CN=DnsAdmins,CN=Users,DC=XXXX,DC=com -
>> ../lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c:1107: unique index violation on objectSid
>> in CN=DnsAdmins,CN=Users,DC=XXXX,DC=com')
> So, as it says:  Somehow in either the old or new provision (I'm not
> 100% sure), a duplicate SID has been added, but was not previously
> detected.
> Can you see if you can find the DnsAdmins record in the old DB and see
> if that might be the problem?
> Perhaps it's the recent DNS-related provision change causing problems?
> Andrew Bartlett

This message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. In case you are not the original intended recipient of the message, you must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message and you are requested to delete it and inform the sender. 

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender unless otherwise stated. Nothing contained in this message shall be construed as an offer or acceptance of any offer by "Catalyst Business Partners" or any of its subsidiaries unless sent with that express intent and with due authority of Catalyst Business Partners. 

Catalyst Business Partners has taken sufficient measures and precautions to prevent the spread of viruses. However the company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.

More information about the samba-technical mailing list