LDB hidden memory leaks
esiotrot at gmail.com
Sat Jul 10 03:35:11 MDT 2010
On 10 July 2010 10:16, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher <metze at samba.org> wrote:
> Hi Kamen,
>> I think I am done with ldb refactoring for now
>> (at least, we should get a lot less leaked ldb_msg objects during
>> I will appreciate if you find some spare time to review my branch at:
> Regarding the reformating:
> I'd like to push this patch
> which explains good and bad comment example.
Comments should always use the standard C syntax. C++
-style comments are not currently allowed.
+style comments are not currently allowed. The lines before
+a comment should be empty. If the comment directly belongs
+to the following code, there should be no empty line after
+the comment. In case the comment contains a summary of
+mutliple following code blogs.
Also, the last sentence is not a complete sentence. Did you mean the following?
"If the comment directly belongs to the following code, there should
be no empty line after
the comment, except if the comment contains a summary of multiple
following code blocks."
Michael Wood <esiotrot at gmail.com>
More information about the samba-technical