about new users DnsAdmins & DnsUpdateProxy

Matthieu Patou mat at samba.org
Mon Jul 5 11:34:06 MDT 2010

  On 05/07/2010 16:33, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 11:46 +0400, Matthieu Patou wrote:
>> Hi metze,
>>> Hi Matthieu,
>>>> Is it important that the SID is 1101/1102 ? or could it be any sid
>>>> available after 1000 ? (chosen by samdb  as the two next available SID ?)
>>> No they're not fixed, they're allocated from the rid pool of the first dc
>>> (if you let dcpromo also install the DNS-Server). If you don't install
>>> DNS, they're not created at all.
>>> If the rid pool of the first dc is 1100-1599 they get 1101/1102,
>>> if it's 500100-500599 they get 500101/500102.
>> Ok that's what I was thinking, the reason why I ask this is that for
>> provision that have lived a little bit this sid are used sometimes and
>> it cause conflict.
>> I plan to issue a patch to remove sids when copying missing object if
>> SID>999.--
> So this would re-allocate the SID of an object that appears in the
> reference provision but not in the original provision?  (That will be
> correct)
I guess so, I have a couple of other pbs (see my other emails) with 
upgrade from alpha8 to current alpha12.

So I didn't made extensives tests to validate this hypothesis.


Matthieu Patou
Samba Team        http://samba.org

More information about the samba-technical mailing list