Talloc memory overhead vs malloc

[John Carter]

Whilst the talloc doc speaks of a 4% performance penalty compared to
malloc (something I find quite acceptable)...

I'd like to use talloc in a _very_ resource constrained
environment. Hence two questions...

  * What is the memory overhead per allocation compared to malloc?

  * Could I tweak it to use less, for example lose the filename/line
    number information (and use something like
    __builtin_return_address() instead)


Thanks!

John Carter                             Phone : (64)(3) 358 6639
Tait Electronics                        Fax   : (64)(3) 359 4632
PO Box 1645 Christchurch                Email : john.carter at tait.co.nz
New Zealand