[NT ACLS] Using the security.* namespace for NTACL considered improper
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Tue Jan 19 14:00:09 MST 2010
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 03:56:59PM -0500, simo wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 12:42 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:40:28PM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:29:52PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > > > Do you know of any production sites that are using this ?
> > > > The modules are still marked experimental, so I'm not aware
> > > > of any real use out there. Might be wrong though. Anyone out
> > > > there using vfs_acl_xattr please chime in. We'd have to write a
> > > > 'net acl migrate' command to rename these attributes.
> > >
> > > Well, that wouldn't work in the field. What about data on
> > > tape?
> > Yes, you're right. Working users out there take precedence.
> Do we have any ?
Have you seen the number of bug reports that came in because
we accidentially broke access for Win98? You never know who
is lurking out there :-)
More information about the samba-technical