Successor to v3-5-test ?

[Jeremy Allison]

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:30:59AM +0100, Karolin Seeger wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:20:52AM +0100, Björn Jacke wrote:
> > On 2010-01-18 at 10:32 +0100 Kai Blin sent off:
> > > It seems to me that branching off v3-6-test even before3.5.0 is released 
> > > mostly creates extra work for people checking in bug fixes and new features.
> > > Of course Karolin has the final call there, but I would think that branching 
> > > off v3-6-test to allow features to stabilize could be done about a month 
> > > before the scheduled release date.
> > 
> > +1
> > 
> > as we synced master to 3.5 many weeks after 3.5 was created we should maybe
> > create a 3.6 branch not much earlier than a couple of days before 3.6rc1 is
> > scheduled. Anything else will just cause more work for everyone.
> 
> Sorry, but I think a couple of days before 3.6rc1 is too late.

Yes, I agree. We need a separate branch for stabilization
purposes.

> Volker> I'd vote for 4 weeks before the first preview release.

+1 from me (from NZ :-).