Successor to v3-5-test ?

Björn Jacke bj at SerNet.DE
Mon Jan 18 03:20:52 MST 2010


On 2010-01-18 at 10:32 +0100 Kai Blin sent off:
> It seems to me that branching off v3-6-test even before3.5.0 is released 
> mostly creates extra work for people checking in bug fixes and new features.
> Of course Karolin has the final call there, but I would think that branching 
> off v3-6-test to allow features to stabilize could be done about a month 
> before the scheduled release date.

+1

as we synced master to 3.5 many weeks after 3.5 was created we should maybe
create a 3.6 branch not much earlier than a couple of days before 3.6rc1 is
scheduled. Anything else will just cause more work for everyone.

Cheers
Björn
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20100118/ef7da69d/attachment.pgp>


More information about the samba-technical mailing list