ntacl and upgradeprovision patches
mat at matws.net
Wed Jan 13 14:48:01 MST 2010
I made two make tests today after make clean + git clean -f -d
I have the same error on master and in the merge branch.
So I'm rather inclined to think that they are not generated by my patches.
On 13/01/2010 09:02, Matthieu Patou wrote:
> On 13/01/2010 08:41, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 20:32 +0300, Matthieu Patou wrote:
>>> Needless to say that with this set of patch upgradeprovision is able to
>>> upgrade properly an alpha10 provision with your patches (that were
>>> reverted then by tridge) and without.
>>> This set of patch a built upon the fact that the changeset
>>> 2cedefabc93c8a1fcb49d65a3f78a344e814f826 is reverted.
>>> Andrew: can you give me your comments on those patches ?
>> I tried to merge these, and the other branches you pushed to your repo,
>> but kept running into issues - both the compile fix you noted on IRC
>> (easily fixed) and then failures in 'make test'.
> Strange for the failure but my make test was on a rebase of 1/2 old.
> What seems most of a problem is that I don't face the build pb on my
> I'll rerun today tests to see what's going on in the hope that I will
> trigger error also !
>> Can you let me know when you have a rebased branch of the ACL and
>> upgradeprovision patches that passes 'make test'?
>> I'm sorry I couldn't keep working on it, but I have a demo to rig (my
>> talk at the SysAdmin mini-conf before linux.conf.au :-)
> No big deal we can wait for 1/2 more days !
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 45384 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the samba-technical