ntacl and upgradeprovision patches

[Matthieu Patou]

On 13/01/2010 08:41, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 20:32 +0300, Matthieu Patou wrote:
>
>    
>> Needless to say that with this set of patch upgradeprovision is able to
>> upgrade properly an alpha10 provision with your patches (that were
>> reverted then by tridge) and without.
>>
>> This set of patch a built upon the fact that the changeset
>> 2cedefabc93c8a1fcb49d65a3f78a344e814f826 is reverted.
>>
>> Andrew: can you give me your comments on those patches ?
>>      
> I tried to merge these, and the other branches you pushed to your repo,
> but kept running into issues - both the compile fix you noted on IRC
> (easily fixed) and then failures in 'make test'.
>
>    
Strange for the failure but my make test was on a rebase of 1/2 old.
What seems most of a problem is that I don't face the build pb on my 
computer.

I'll rerun today tests to see what's going on in the hope that I will 
trigger error also !
> Can you let me know when you have a rebased branch of the ACL and
> upgradeprovision patches that passes 'make test'?
>
>    
Ok
> I'm sorry I couldn't keep working on it, but I have a demo to rig (my
> talk at the SysAdmin mini-conf before linux.conf.au :-)
>
>    
No big deal we can wait for 1/2 more days !

Matthieu.