[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated

Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer mdw at samba.org
Tue Jan 12 10:02:44 MST 2010


Hi Matthieu,

as you obviously didn't notice you can't find the differences at the 
moment. This is because tridge reverted the modifications in 
"provision_users.ldif" for now. This was due to a failing torture test 
in "make test" which wasn't fixed.

So my apologies, you have to wait. I will recheckin the patches first, 
in a more clear manner (since the last time the diff's were indeed very 
hard to read - I forgot to control them and noticed this only later) and 
second, when the torture suite also works against them.

Regarding the correction of the "upgradeprovision" script: I find this 
very good. I introduced it since previously we had no real mechanism for 
linked-attribute dependency resolving. Therefore I would really like to 
let this in. Obviously, this doesn't fix the other issue with the wrong 
"groupType"s (but I think we should work on this after the mentioned 
"provision_users.ldif" changes - since now you can't notice them).

Greets,
Matthias

Matthieu Patou wrote:
> Hello Mathias,
> I'm not too pleased with this change as it tends to commit stuff 
> partially instead of one together once we are sure that everything was 
> (correctly) added at least with this way of doing we are sure that 
> once that the commit is done all the schema or all the partitions has 
> been updated and that the whole thing is relatively coherent.
>
>
> Also apart from the groupType that we talk last sunday on irc, you 
> told me that some object where misplaced but when I do an 
> upgradeprovision against a alpha10 provision and I only found those 2 
> changes:
>
> * CN=dns,CN=Users,DC=home,DC=matws,DC=net exist but with the wrong 
> objectSID
> * CN=RID Set,CN=ARES,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=home,DC=matws,DC=net
>
> Where are the other problem that you faced ?
>
> Mattieu.
>



More information about the samba-technical mailing list