CMake Proposal

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 20:25 -0500, simo wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 11:40 +1100, tridge at samba.org wrote:
> > I also think calling cmake 'standard' is a bit of a stretch.

> I hoped that putting our hands and heads on the build system
> could be a good opportunity to tray and fix some of these problems at
> the same time, whatever the build system used.

I really think we should make a good choice of build system for the
future of Samba, and then try to reduce the complexity or dependency
problems.  Or, reduce those first then pick a build system that suits
the new, easier problem.  

We should not mix the two very big challenges into one step.  

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20100225/7efd9822/attachment.pgp>