cost of tdb transactions on ext4 with barriers
rusty at rustcorp.com.au
Fri Feb 12 02:02:12 MST 2010
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:09:45 am tridge at samba.org wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
> I put a new disk in my laptop today, and thought I'd give ext4 a go
> (on a 2.6.31-19 Ubuntu karmic kernel).
> I found that some of the ldb and tdb tests were massively slower on
> ext4 than ext3. I wrote a little script to demonstrate:
> It creates a new fs on a spare block device, and runs a speedtest (the
> usage gives examples for tdbtorture and ldbtest).
> With tdbtorture I get:
> ext3 barrier=0 1.9s
> ext4 barrier=0 2.5s
> ext3 barrier=1 13.4s
> ext4 barrier=1 36.0s
> The change of default in ext4 to have barriers enabled is obviously
> hurting us a lot, but what is surprising is the comparison between
> ext3 with barriers and ext4 with barriers. Why are barriers hurting
> tdb on ext4 so much more than on ext3?
> I know you've recently been looking into the cost of barriers with
> tdb, so I wondered if you had any idea why this happens?
> Meanwhile, I've disabled barriers on my devel ext4 filesystem on my
> laptop as otherwise doing testing of s4 is far too painful (it adds
> about 15 minutes to 'make test').
Hmm, I don't know. This is where we ask Ted :)
My "expertise" in this are came entirely from running tdbtorture without
barriers and pulling the plug from my test machine to demonstrate corrupted
Ted, you can read whole thread here:
More information about the samba-technical