Final fixes for bug #7119.
jra at samba.org
Wed Feb 10 09:50:02 MST 2010
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 05:37:42PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> Jeremy Allison schrieb:
> > On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 10:05:22AM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 12:00:55PM -0600, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
> >>> The branch, master has been updated
> >>> via 1686a5e... s3:smbd: Fix really ugly bool vs. int bug!!!
> >> Oh I missed that in the review, sorry :-(. We'll need that
> >> in 3.5.0. Can you attach to the bug report and get Karolin
> >> to push ?
> > Karolin,
> > I've updated:
> > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7119
> > with the fixes metze just added to master. We'll need
> > these to fully fix this for 3.5.0.
> I just found why the transs continue messages isn't always generated...
> We don't respect the clients buffer size (from the first session setup)
> when doing extended security... Is that correct?
Yes, I think that's correct. I recall this code being added
initially via Isilon, on testing with Win2K3 servers.
> My w2k3 test servers is happy to get the large responses in one trans
> response. So I'm not sure if it's a bug or a feature...
More information about the samba-technical