Removing autotools build from tdb ?

[Jelmer Vernooij]

On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 11:19 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:16:21 am Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > Hi Rusty, Tridge,
> > 
> > At the moment both talloc and tdb still have code to support a
> > autotools-based build, while waf is the default build system.
> > 
> > These builds generate libraries without symbol versioning and they are
> > yet another place where we need to keep the version number up to date
> > (both configure.ac files are currently out of date). They are also yet
> > two more different configurations that we need to keep building,
> > although that's not really been an issue so far.
> > 
> > Would you object to removing the autotools-based builds code?
> ISTR I already acked this?
We switched the default build system from autoconf to waf a while ago,
perhaps that's what you mean? Or maybe I did ask but forgot to actually
remove the files. 

Either way, I'll remove the remaining cruft. Thanks!

Cheers,

Jelmer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20101222/a58f65c7/attachment.pgp>