Fixes to LDB memory handling
abartlet at samba.org
Fri Dec 17 01:18:41 MST 2010
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 09:08 +0100, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote:
> yes, this looks to be my fault. Feel free to revert this code piece!
Yes, I plan to. But I still would like to know what brought you to
making this change in the first place. How did you determine this was a
leak? I would like to ensure we resolve whatever issue you were
originally dealing with.
Or was this just a the result of visual code analysis? (i.e. reading
the code and 'spotting' the leak). Did you do any validation other than
'make test' that I should repeat after reverting the patch?
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the samba-technical