Fixes to LDB memory handling

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 09:08 +0100, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote:
> Andrew,
> 
> yes, this looks to be my fault. Feel free to revert this code piece!

Yes, I plan to.  But I still would like to know what brought you to
making this change in the first place.  How did you determine this was a
leak?  I would like to ensure we resolve whatever issue you were
originally dealing with. 

Or was this just a the result of visual code analysis?  (i.e. reading
the code and 'spotting' the leak).  Did you do any validation other than
'make test' that I should repeat after reverting the patch?

Thanks,

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20101217/a331f569/attachment.pgp>