s4: Patch for "libnet/libnet_samsync_ldb.c"

Jelmer Vernooij jelmer at samba.org
Sat Dec 11 21:41:55 MST 2010

On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 12:01 +0100, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote:
> Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 15:44 +0100, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote:
> >    
> >> Regarding the other return values beside ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR for out of
> >> memory it's not so easy. Caller functions differ in behaviour regarding
> >> NTSTATUS results - so I really thought it only to be used by msg_add*
> >> calls and not for "ldb_add", "ldb_modify" ecc.
> >>      
> > Considering that, perhaps it would make more sense for the
> > samdb_msg_add_* functions to return a NTSTATUS value directly?
> >    
> then we cannot use them in the LDB modules anymore. Do you have another 
> proposal?
which LDB modules do you mean specifically, and why can't we use them
there anymore?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20101212/5faf05e7/attachment.pgp>

More information about the samba-technical mailing list