double check of python in
Jelmer Vernooij
jelmer at samba.org
Sat Dec 4 18:47:40 MST 2010
Hi Matthieu,
On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 13:50 +0300, Matthieu Patou wrote:
> You might be not the good one to answer this question so please feel
> free to redirect me.
>
> I discovered that we have this in ./source4/scripting/python/wscript:
>
> def configure(conf):
> # enable tool to build python extensions
> conf.check_tool('python')
> conf.check_python_version((2,4,2))
> conf.check_python_headers()
>
>
> It looks pretty much like what we have in ./source4/wscript
>
> So is there a good reason to duplicate this tests ?
I don't think there is a need to duplicate those tests. Perhaps we can
remove the one from source4/scripting/python/wscript. Tridge knows this
code better than I do though, so perhaps he can comment?
Cheers,
Jelmer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20101205/904560c8/attachment.pgp>
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list