Differences after 'dcpromo' Windows2008R2 off from Samba4

[Zahari Zahariev]

Matthias,

Thanks anyway!

Kamen will try to make "net drs replicate" return real results (now it does false positive) and when we know replication works both ways (for real) then most of this differences should be gone. 

---
Zahari Zahariev,
Software Engineer, Cisco Systems,
PPD & Installer team  

----- Original Message -----
> From: samba-technical-bounces at lists.samba.org <samba-technical-bounces at lists.samba.org>
> To: Zahari Zahariev <zahari.zahariev at gmail.com>
> Cc: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher <metze at samba.org>, samba-technical at lists.samba.org <samba-technical at lists.samba.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 10:07:19 PM (GMT+02:00) Athens, Bucharest, Istanbul
> Subject: Re: Differences after 'dcpromo' Windows2008R2 off from Samba4

> > Zahari,
> 
> I think that this differences lie in the "libnet_join" code - and not 
> in 
> the LDIFs (since there most have been fixed). I would appreciate if 
> someone which is skilled there could fix them. I am really not 
> familiar 
> with those many subrequests which have to match closely with Windows. 
> Probably metze can say more.
> It could also be that some LDB module code is still missing.
> 
> Matthias
> 
> Zahari Zahariev wrote:
> > Hi Metze&  list,
> >
> > This is latest log from my "dcpromo" automated environment. The 
> process is
> > the following:<file:///home/zahari/Desktop/dcpromo.log>
> >
> >     1. Compile&  provision Samba4 DC
> >     2. Check the Samba4 DC various services if they work properly
> >     3. Revert Windows2008R2 machine to a vanilla state
> >     4. Execute (via expect script&  telnet) dcpromo on the 
> Windows2008R2 box
> >     against the Samba4 DC
> >     5. Restart Windows2008R2 server
> >     6. Timeout&  check if Windows services respond correctly
> >     7. Run LDAPCmp to find differences right after the "dcpromo" 
> process
> >
> >   Can you tell me is there something that looks like something that 
> must not
> > be happening to you in the LDAPCmp report?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >