Please try to upgrade an alpha10 when enforcing new rules in samdb
abartlet at samba.org
Sun Aug 15 00:55:20 MDT 2010
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 10:30 +0400, Matthieu Patou wrote:
> On 15/08/2010 05:00, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 00:04 +0400, Matthieu Patou wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> Is this kind of patch ok for you ?
> >> Should I wait until MDW fix the two pb that I noted or should I push it
> >> now ?
> > We can't add tests that fail, so you will need to work with mdw to sort
> > out the issues (or at least mark it as knownfail for now). In any case,
> > I don't see any patch attached, so I can't really comment.
> Sorry I forget to paste this URL:
This looks fine.
We should make it 'pass' if the old provision tarball is not present, so
we can exclude it from the tarballs we distribute. Also perhaps we
should bzip2 it?
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the samba-technical