[PATCH] Please review my session-info branch

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Sat Aug 14 19:37:42 MDT 2010

I've been working to rationalise the 'session_info' code in Samba4,
partly to try and fix the issue that I introduced a while back, where
changes to Samba4's smbtorture caused failures in 'make test' in Samba3.

The problem was that smbtorture in this case runs an un-provisioned
Samba4 server in the smbtorture binanry.  This change causes the
anonymous case to be just hard-coded again, rather than referring to
sam.ldb or privilages.ldb. 


My tests now show that RPC-SPOOLSS-NOTIFY passes, but other spoolss
tests still fail.  Is there anything more I need to to show that I've
fixed https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7486 ?  The example
shown can never have worked - we have always required a provision to
launch the 'samba' server, so can you give me a more specific test that
would work enough for what RPC-SPOOLSS-NOTIFY needs?


The question I have for you is:  Does this change break some use of the
acl.py test that isn't picked up by make test?

The changes are in my 'session-info' branch:

Andrew Bartlett
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20100815/0ca26cc9/attachment.pgp>

More information about the samba-technical mailing list