smbc_open error

[Rechtien, Elizabeth J]

Thank you Derrell!!

Terry, does that help at all? Could there possibly be a login set up issue on the .6??

From: derrell.lipman at gmail.com [mailto:derrell.lipman at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Derrell Lipman
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 7:36 PM
To: Rechtien, Elizabeth J
Cc: Penn, Terry; samba-technical at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: smbc_open error

On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 16:50, Rechtien, Elizabeth J <Elizabeth.Rechtien at stlukes-stl.com<mailto:Elizabeth.Rechtien at stlukes-stl.com>> wrote:
A few weeks ago I was comparing the samba command line output for the .6 with the samba command used through the C program for the .6 server.

This time I'm trying to compare using the samba command going to the .17 and the .6 in the C program. The .17 works with the C program. The .6 does not. Does this make sense?

I just ran the .17 through again. Can you see the IP in this one?
14623  63.767296       10.5.192.101   10.50.5.17       SMB    Session Setup AndX Request, NTLMSSP_AUTH, User: WORKGROUP\token_administrator
14624  63.768278       10.50.5.17       10.5.192.101   SMB    Session Setup AndX Response
14625  63.768328       10.5.192.101   10.50.5.17       SMB    Tree Connect AndX Request, Path: \\10.50.5.17\SCIPDF
14627  63.768797       10.50.5.17       10.5.192.101   SMB    Tree Connect AndX Response

This one succeeded, but didn't use the anonymous user; it used WORKGROUP\token_administrator

Derrell

DISCLAIMER:  The contents of this e-mail, including any attachments, contain information which may be confidential, legally privileged, proprietary in nature, or otherwise protected by law from disclosure, and is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this e-mail, including any attachments, is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us via return e-mail and immediately delete all copies of it from your system. Any opinions either expressed or implied in this e-mail and all attachments, are those of its author only, and do not necessarily reflect those of St. Luke's Hospital.