[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated - release-4-0-0alpha8-1376-gffd48a7

Jelmer Vernooij jelmer at samba.org
Fri Sep 25 17:55:39 MDT 2009


On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 16:50 -0700, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 01:49 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 16:36 -0700, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 12:58 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > > > Hi Andrew,
> > > > 
> > > > On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 11:52 -0700, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 16:21 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Matthias,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I think we should move those files back for clarity's sake. I'm happy to
> > > > > > do the revert and fix the init file, but if you have time feel free to
> > > > > > do so as well.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Jelmer
> > > > > Could you handle this one?  You might want to try it out on a few
> > > > > systems first, as I'm pretty sure there is a system-dependency here.
> > > > > That is, when we first saw this, it happened only on some systems with
> > > > > the 'dcerpc' tests, hence that patch.  The new problem seems similar,
> > > > > but we are confused.
> > > > > 
> > > > > That is, Samba that worked fine on my Fedora 10 machine failed on my
> > > > > mac, then failed on Fedora 11 (from memory). 
> > > > It should be fixed now. I was actually surprised that it worked on some
> > > > machines *without* the __init__.py file.
> > > > 
> > > > If you still run into failures please let me know.
> > > 
> > > I still see broken python tests that look like the same issue on the
> > > build farm. 
> > Which hosts? A quick check of all the build farm hosts don't
> > demonstrate this issue - those hosts that do get to the DCE/RPC tests
> > seems to be able to run them fine.
> 
> Sure, but the provision tests (samba.tests.provision) still fail for
> example.
This particular commit that I reverted had moved the tests in
samba.tests.dcerpc to samba.tests because they were failing. These
changes don't affect the tests for provision at all, how is it related?

Cheers,

Jelmer

-- 
Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at samba.org> - http://samba.org/~jelmer/
Jabber: jelmer at jabber.fsfe.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20090926/9fbf80a8/attachment.pgp>


More information about the samba-technical mailing list