s4: Should we still support the "domain mixed mode"?

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 08:56 +0000, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote:
> abartlet and others,
>  
> since I do some rewrite of the SAMLDB module of s4 at the moment
> (since I discovered that our actual not fits for future enhancements
> - discovered with tests and the WSPP documentation) I wanted to ask if
> we still should support the domain mixed mode.
> This as you may know would require some extra case distinguishing
> regarding the group handling (mainly the "member" attribute handling).
> If we aren't supporting it anymore we could save us some work.

I can't see any reason to support 'mixed mode'.  NT4 died 10 years ago.

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20090911/fe8309be/attachment.pgp>