[s4/LDB] ldap.py status
nadezhda.ivanova at postpath.com
Mon Oct 5 01:45:38 MDT 2009
I will take a look at "nTSecurityDescriptor" tests. It is possible that it fails because of a difference between samba and Windows behavior, Zahari and I will establish this some time today.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: samba-technical-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-technical-
> bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Matthias Dieter Wallnofer
> Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 8:59 PM
> To: Andrew Bartlett
> Cc: tridge; samba-technical
> Subject: Re: [s4/LDB] ldap.py status
> Hi abartlet,
> Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer schrieb:
> > Hi abartlet,
> > Andrew Bartlett schrieb:
> >> On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 16:50 +0200, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote:
> >>> - "nTSecurityDescriptor" tests need adaptions (are broken at the
> >>> moment) - I hope Zahari, which wrote it has interest to fix it
> >> Does this pass against Windows?
> > Not tested yet.
> > Matthias
> Tested now and doesn't work.
> Another point:
> In this commit you added a return value of LDB_ERR_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM.
> Did that work in the MS testsuite? My Windows Server returns
> LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION here. I would change if you don't mind.
> Otherwise the test is doing fine (except the "parentGUID" thing which
> never passed against Windows Server since it seems to be a hidden
More information about the samba-technical