s4-drs: cope with bogus empty attributes from w2k8-r2 (Re: [SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated)

Kamen Mazdrashki kamen.mazdrashki at postpath.com
Mon Nov 30 08:09:28 MST 2009


On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 15:56, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher <metze at samba.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Tridge,
> 
> >  > do you know the attid space is splitted into multiple parts,  >
> not
> > all ids are mapped via the prefix map, some are also mapped  > to
> > static values defined with the msDs-intID (or a similar name)  > in
> > the schema objects.
> >
> > I didn't know that, thanks! Do you have an example of how I would
> > lookup one of those attids?
> >
> >  > Are the attid's different each time you run the test?
> >
> > no, they are the same each time. Here are the two I get at the
> moment:
> >
> >   Discarding bogus empty DsReplicaAttribute with attid 0x98e17dfb
> >   Discarding bogus empty DsReplicaAttribute with attid 0x853c1d03
> >
> > do those numbers mean anything to you?
> 
> Yes, see MS-ADTS 3.1.1.2.6 ATTRTYP
> 
> they're both in the 0x80000000-0xBFFFFFFF range, which means the
> attributes should have a msDs-intID value autogenerated.
> 
> I that case mapping doesn't work via the prefix mapping.
> 
> the attributeID (or governsID) is directly mapped to the attid in the
> msDS-intId value.
> 
Thanks a *lot* metze!

Btw, do you have any idea when OID is mapped using prefixMap, and
when using 'msDS-intId'?

CU,
Kamen Mazdrashki
kamen.mazdrashki at postpath.com
http://repo.or.cz/w/Samba/kamenim.git
-------------------------------------
CISCO SYSTEMS BULGARIA EOOD
http://www.cisco.com/global/BG/



More information about the samba-technical mailing list