[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated

Tim Prouty tim.prouty at isilon.com
Wed Nov 25 14:18:00 MST 2009


On Nov 25, 2009, at 8:49 AM, Tim Prouty wrote:

> The branch, master has been updated
>       via  17caf63... s3 selftest: Add RAW-SFILEINFO-END-OF-FILE to  
> selftest
>       via  af610a6... s3 setfileinfo: Open with FILE_WRITE_DATA when  
> setting the file size
>       via  b6f9722... s4 torture: Change RAW-OPLOCK to use the  
> documented version of SET_END_OF_FILE_INFO
>       via  98f5950... s4 torture: Allow onefs to be checked like  
> samba3 and samba4
>       via  6074a05... s4 torture: Add two new setfileinfo tests
>       via  ce9ac3a... s4 torture: Split up the torture suite setup  
> for RAW-SFILEINFO
>      from  56eca75... The start of a WHATSNEW for Samba4 alpha9
>
> http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
>
>
> commit ce9ac3a685e2a23b30952bf20dbe3f9bf24dfaaa
> Author: Tim Prouty <tprouty at samba.org>
> Date:   Tue Nov 24 16:25:02 2009 -0800
>
>    s4 torture: Split up the torture suite setup for RAW-SFILEINFO
>
>    A side effect of this change is that RAW-SFILEINFO now runs the  
> whole
>    suite instead of just the first test.  I changed the name of the  
> first
>    test to RAW-SFILEINFO-BASE and changed all of the selftest scripts
>    that call it.

I would like to solicit some help from a selftest/samba 4 expert on  
how to get selftest working with this recent commit.

RAW-SFILEINFO was explcitly defined in raw.c along with subtests such  
as RAW-SFILEINFO-BUG.  I modified RAW-SFILEINFO to reference the suite  
of tests which now includes subtests such as RAW-SFILEINFO-BUG.  Since  
it is no longer possible to have a specific test called RAW-SFILEINFO,  
I modified it to be called RAW-SFILEINFO-BASE.

I changed all of the samba3 make test references from RAW-SFILEINFO to  
RAW-SFILEINFO-BASE, but I'm having trouble doing the same in samba4.   
I tried changing source4/selftest/quick to include a line  
"raw.sfileinfo.base" rather than "raw.sfileinfo", but it doesn't seem  
to parse correctly and just skips the test.  I could just remove it  
from quicktest, but that seems like a last resort.  Additionally, the  
full 'make test' far samba4 needs a similar adjustment.

I've been looking at this now for a few hours and need some guidance  
from someone who knows how this all fits together a little better than  
me :).

Thanks!

-Tim


More information about the samba-technical mailing list