cristiandeives at gmail.com
Mon Nov 23 10:52:43 MST 2009
does the attached patch fix the problem? I'm not very familiar with talloc
memory stealing yet.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:37 AM, <tridge at samba.org> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> > Yes, I think it should be ldb_msg_add_linearized_dn(). That would match
> > the current nomenclature of the ldb_dn.c code, and not add an extended
> > DN (which is another, quite valid DN form).
> yep, you're right.
> > Perhaps just use ldb_msg_add_steal_string() and
> > ldb_dn_alloc_linearized()?
> good suggestion.
> Cheers, Tridge
Crístian Deives dos Santos Viana [aka CD1]
Sent from Campinas, SP, Brazil
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3846 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the samba-technical