Commit: 1169dd3b50dfefa59b56cd1897bcd0b6c2ffb3be

[tridge at samba.org]

Hi Andrew,

 > Yes, I think it should be ldb_msg_add_linearized_dn().  That would match
 > the current nomenclature of the ldb_dn.c code, and not add an extended
 > DN (which is another, quite valid DN form).

yep, you're right.

 > Perhaps just use ldb_msg_add_steal_string() and
 > ldb_dn_alloc_linearized()?

good suggestion.

Cheers, Tridge