LDB: Patch for fixing counter variables
Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer
mdw at samba.org
Mon Nov 9 08:11:50 MST 2009
Volker Lendecke wrote:
> A quick side-remark for this: I've recently figured out that
> for most arrays the explicit counter is superfluous, as we
> now have talloc_array_length().
Ah, that would indeed be a nice method to skip those length/amount
specification variables. But for LDB that means huge API changes which
for sure aren't welcome.
Anyway, my patch considers the wrong-typed "i,j" counters which would
have to be corrected also with that approach.
More information about the samba-technical