DNS and GENSEC issues when running the samba binary

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 16:55 -0200, Crístian Viana wrote:
> I just noticed something by looking at Erick's log. I don't even know if
> it's related to this problem but I'm wondering why it happens.
> 
> Here's part of the error log:
> 
>  Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 -
> > NT_STATUS_INVALID_
> 
> PARAMETER

The NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER may be due to Kerberos not working.  If
we can't contact the KDC, then the Kerberos mechanisms return this error
to indicate that they can't be used.  The code requires kerberos (for
Win2000 compatibility), and so this error is returned. 

> 
> That UUID is the same one that is shown when I try to run "samba" here, on
> my machine. They're different computers, different domains. Shouldn't those
> UUIDs be different for each one of us?

This is a pipe UUID. 

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20091107/0b86cb93/attachment.pgp>