[PATCH]: wbc: expand wbcAuthUserParams to pass alternate domain\user

[Steven Danneman]

> 
> Steven Danneman wrote:
> 
> > Eliminating support for "username map" in conjunction with NTLMv2
> would
> > remove the need to pass a second username through wbc.  This is of
> > course a decent feature limitation.
> 
> I was just curious.  Not suggesting it as a real change.  Just
> wondering about limiting the scope of the problem.
> 
> 
> > As far as having the correct domain, which was used to create the
> hash,
> > from the V2Response blob, empirically I haven't seen this.  From
> Vista,
> > if a NULL domain is sent, the V2Response blob still contains the
> NetBios
> > name of the server.  I've attached a pcap.
> 
> Yeah.  I see that in the trace.  Thanks.  Helped a bunch.  Not sure
> that we could generalize anything from it.  The DNS domain name is
NULL
> as would be expected so I would bet there is some correlation.
> I'll look into it some more, but unless I have any working solution,
> I'd have to agree with the structure change.  Of course, that is just
> from a technical code audit PoV and has no real bearing on whether
> the change is accepted into upstream.
> 

Thanks for the thorough review and questions.  Certainly, changing
existing functionality in the wbc API isn't something that should be
done lightly or without review.

-Steven