[linux-cifs-client] Re: [PATCH] cifs: fix fh_mutex locking in
smfrench at gmail.com
Sun Jun 28 13:02:16 MDT 2009
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Steve French<smfrench at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Jeff Layton<jlayton at redhat.com> wrote:
> In any case, as long as we are sure we are hitting a Samba server
> limit (or server side
> per-process limit), we are ok and can continue to review/merge the very large
> inode patches. I am verifying with one additional pair of temporary
> stats (counters of successful opens) in the exit path of cifs_open and
> to make sure that those match what I have already verified that we are seeing
> with smbstatus and the client side counters on number of successful posix_opens.
I am puzzled about the Samba 3.4 max files limit (I am seeing it at
1014 opens) and seems
strange that dbench would open so many files, but with counters in
cifs_open and cifs_close - I see 1014 more opens than closes (from the vfs)
which matches what I see at the SMB level and what I see in Samba server.
dbench 4 fails even faster. This also fails on other OS (opensuse,
but worked on Samba 3.0.28. Is it possible that Samba 3.4 changed their
max open file limit?
More information about the samba-technical