talloc -- Eureka*

Tue Jul 28 11:34:12 MDT 2009

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 05:44:52PM +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote:
> And yet we still have innocent simple country folk like me and Volker  
> who want to take a talloc_reference and keep it.

Ok, I seem to be irony-agnostic, at least when looking at
this paragraph. I really wonder how I gave the impression to
have anything but the immediate death of talloc_reference in
mind...

Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20090728/e0598b13/attachment.pgp>