Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Fri Jul 24 03:30:38 MDT 2009
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 12:42:04PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > Comments?
> It's not really my area, but it seems like a really big improvement.
> My only question is: does it remove the SMB_VFS_LAYER_TRANSPARENT and
> SMB_VFS_LAYER_OPAQUE etc? I've never had reason to try and understand
> what they did, so I don't know if it's a loss.
Yes, it removes them. The _OPAQUE_ macros were completely
unused anyway, so it was really unused. The new scheme is
right what you would expect: vfs_default provides the
default actions for all the operations, and modules can step
in, calling the lower level with _NEXT_.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the samba-technical