Is there a reason to have source4 in 3.4 releases?

[Volker Lendecke]

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 09:06:51PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Since Samba 3.4 has been released, I've now seen two different enquires
> where folks have expected to find a 'released' version of Samba4 in the
> 3.4 tarball.
> 
> Is there any reason for the source4 tree to be released in Samba 3.4
> releases?  Users of Samba4 from that branch are only going to be
> disappointed (as it is will be an increasingly older snapshot), and the
> work for 'Franky' and other combined tree efforts is occouring in
> master, not the 3.4 release tree.
> 
> (For similar reasons, I remove source3 and the Samba3 WHATSNEW etc from
> the Samba4 alpha releases)

From my point of view we can certainly remove the source4/
directory for 3.4.1.

Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20090715/8c429ec5/attachment.pgp>