the sorry saga of the talloc soname 'fix'
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Wed Jul 8 08:40:48 GMT 2009
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 09:15:52AM +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote:
> talloc_free is not safe to use, so we may as well get rid of it
> altogether and thus fully justify the .so version bump.
Wow. That's strong.
I'd rather not have to remember everywhere I use talloc
which the parent is. I'd much more prefer to go back to
talloc being the "hierarchical" memory allocator with a
strict tree. I don't see how without talloc_reference
talloc_free becomes ambiguous.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20090708/e748ce4a/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical