the sorry saga of the talloc soname 'fix'
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Tue Jul 7 05:42:57 GMT 2009
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:17:20PM +1000, tridge at samba.org wrote:
> > This way we don't have to break anything and just increment
> > the minor version number due to talloc_reparent being added.
> nope, I am not going to let the shared library force me into a
> situation where I can't improve talloc when I think that improvement
> is worthwhile.
If we were talking about a significant improvement, I would
be with you. But IMO improved error messages don't justify
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20090707/6c948020/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical