the sorry saga of the talloc soname 'fix'

Tue Jul 7 05:42:57 GMT 2009

On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:17:20PM +1000, tridge at samba.org wrote:
>  > This way we don't have to break anything and just increment
>  > the minor version number due to talloc_reparent being added.
> 
> nope, I am not going to let the shared library force me into a
> situation where I can't improve talloc when I think that improvement
> is worthwhile.

If we were talking about a significant improvement, I would
be with you. But IMO improved error messages don't justify
this.

Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20090707/6c948020/attachment.bin