Samba4 shared FS + MacOS issue

Xavier Ambrosioni xavier.ambrosioni at cinema-voiron.fr
Fri Jan 30 18:59:27 GMT 2009


Hi

in attachment the log file (level 5)

xavier


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: samba.log.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 30697 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20090130/1bd2db1a/samba.log.bin
-------------- next part --------------



Le 30 janv. 09 ? 17:37, George K Colley a ?crit :

>
> On Jan 29, 2009, at 7:43 PM, Xavier Ambrosioni wrote:
>
>> Ok, I will send you the samba log file in few hours. Which log  
>> level do you need?
> Not sure lets try 5 then go from there.
>>
>>
>> I found in the code an option called "server signing". I tried to  
>> set it to "off" and "disabled" but the result is still the same. I  
>> don't know if that option is really implemented yet.
>>
>> Xavier
>>
>> Le 29 janv. 09 ? 22:57, George K Colley <gcolley at apple.com> a ?crit :
>>
>>> So I am not sure what they don't like. We should get the samba 4  
>>> logs and see if they have any info.
>>> On Jan 29, 2009, at 11:35 AM, Xavier Ambrosioni wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi George,
>>>>
>>>> in attachment the dump file starting before the mount of the drive.
>>>> Yes there is the same issue even with 1 byte.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Xavier
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <DumpFile.dmp.gz>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 29 janv. 09 ? 01:10, George K Colley a ?crit :
>>>>
>>>>> One other note doesn't seem to be a size issue because writes of  
>>>>> 1 byte have the same issue?
>>>>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 4:03 PM, George K Colley wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So the SMB packet signing issue which was reported with Win2k  
>>>>>> and Win2K8 system was correct in 10.5.3. That issue was cause  
>>>>>> by the client using the wrong buffer size on writes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now in the trace packet 353 opens a file for read/writing, then  
>>>>>> pack 356 attempts to write 4096 and the server returns an error  
>>>>>> NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL (0xc0000001)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now  packet signing is on, so it could be related just not  
>>>>>> sure. Would like to retest with packet signing turned off, does  
>>>>>> anyone on the list know how to turn signing off with Samba4?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Next can you get me a tcpdump starting before the mount so I  
>>>>>> can see the CAP of the server?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gerge
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Xavier Ambrosioni wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> sorry, I did not know that '-w' option produce a dump with  
>>>>>>> more information.
>>>>>>> You will find that dump in attachment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 172.16.0.2 is the Mac
>>>>>>> 172.16.0.10 is the samba server
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>> Xavier
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <DumpFile.dmp>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Le 28 janv. 09 ? 10:22, Gavin Beatty a ?crit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2009/1/27 Xavier Ambrosioni <xavier.ambrosioni at cinema- 
>>>>>>>> voiron.fr>:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> you will find in attachment the dump file. I used the  
>>>>>>>>> command 'tcpdump -i
>>>>>>>>> en0 -s 0 |grep -v vnc >DumpFile.txt' because I'm currently  
>>>>>>>>> using VNC to
>>>>>>>>> connect to my mac and I wanted to remove the vnc packets  
>>>>>>>>> from the dump file
>>>>>>>>> to decrease its size.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Xavier,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please follow George's instructions as the text output of  
>>>>>>>> tcpdump is
>>>>>>>> not a "dump" in the proper sense. The important part is the -w
>>>>>>>> ~/Desktop/DumpFile.dmp. This writes a true dump file which  
>>>>>>>> has much
>>>>>>>> more (extremely useful!) information. Using wireshark (or  
>>>>>>>> ethereal),
>>>>>>>> it's easy for the samba guys to visually exclude your VNC  
>>>>>>>> traffic when
>>>>>>>> they view the DumpFile.dmp so there is no need for you to  
>>>>>>>> worry about
>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, if you follow George's instructions exactly and attach the
>>>>>>>> DumpFile.dmp, all will be well.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Gavin
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> Gavin Beatty
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> SEMPER UBI SUB UBI
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>



More information about the samba-technical mailing list