Release Samba4 alpha6 without full schema?
abartlet at samba.org
Mon Jan 12 06:28:20 GMT 2009
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 11:49 +0530, Sreepathi Pai wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote:
> > As such, I'm wondering if we should not merge Sreepathi's patch until
> > after the alpha release. We would still have a great set of features to
> > announce, including in particular a solution to the DB-growth bug.
> Fully agree with not merging since I would also really like to
> recompare the schema files generated from the newest MS text files
> with the schema.ldif extracted from an existing Windows server (like
> the one in Alpha 5). Unfortunately I cannot do this within the next
> one week. So please go ahead without the patch.
Great. I'm sorry this has been such a saga.
On that note: Jelmer, any chance you can fix up minschema.py? (We then
need to add an 'all classes' mode). With those two tools, we should be
able to get this comparison done sensibly.
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20090112/8a9b7f56/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical