[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Wed Feb 25 00:06:12 MST 2009
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:26:29AM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> I really think that we should revert that premise, because it creates
> all sorts of little hacks that 'we think help'. Instead, unless someone
> can prove this is actually a win, then we should remove it, avoid yet
> another static variable and bugs that *will* again occur when fork() is
> called directly.
What would be a proof that convinces you?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20090225/9d45b645/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical