[PATCH] Proposed merge of some NTLMSSP crypto

Kai Blin kai at samba.org
Fri Dec 11 03:27:59 MST 2009


On Friday 11 December 2009 10:25:14 Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
Hi Metze,

> I think this patches need some more work to reduce the risk.

I think this is a good general guideline for the merging process.

> 1. Both trees need patches which bring the code step by step
>    in to the same code.
[...]
> 2. All this steps need to be small easy to review patches,
>    which build and pass make test.
>
> 3. Then we need to move the file(s) from one tree to the topdir
>    and make sure everything still works fine.
[...]
> 4. Let the other tree use the different file(s)
>
> 5. Remove the unused files(s)

Do we want this in some document anywhere?

Cheers,
Kai

-- 
Kai Blin
WorldForge developer  http://www.worldforge.org/
Wine developer        http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin
Samba team member     http://www.samba.org/samba/team/
--
Will code for cotton.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20091211/77ed028f/attachment.pgp>


More information about the samba-technical mailing list